There does seem to be another question begging. So many of
the carrots in the two tails of the distribution are in the trouble areas
(clogging or wrong-end chopping) that it appears that the automated in-feeder
is not doing a satisfactory job. In the real processing plant from which Case
study 3.5 was drawn, this was precisely the case (except that the vegetable was
okra, not carrots). The reliability of the product forced the process engineers
to compromise and use a partially automated work station. Space for human
operators on both sides of the shaker tables was provided so that vegetables
that are seen to fall incorrectly could be turned over manually before entering
the chopper area.
Partial automation is not limited to food processes where
product variability is the chief problem. Orientation and alignment of various
kinds of products and machine parts may require intelligent vision or some
sophisticated capabilities which in a given manufacturing process maybe
infeasible either technically or economically. Partial automation, where the
worker and machine each do their parts according to their capabilities is an alternative
that should not be overlooked by the automation engineer. This website has
considered the problem of moving the material or piece parts position for
processing or assembly. Although the operations have been seen to be complicated
and some even ingenious but none has resulted in useful change to the process itself.
Parts feeding and orientation was without doubt important but we are now ready to
consider the automation of machines that process or assemble these parts into
useable products.
The success of an assembly automation project depends not so
much on the achievable motions of industrial robots handling product parts as
it does on the tiny subtleties of positioning and orienting of piece parts for
assembly. Sometimes these detailed
problems can be avoided by preserving parts orientations to begin with, either
during their manufacturing or at the vendor’s site for purchased parts. Lab automation news has an example video and case study of a partial automation device.
Given that parts orientation must be accomplished, clever
mechanical devices are required for this purpose with the principal
representative being the vibratory bowl with parts selectors in the discharge
track. Those parts that the bowl system is unable to select and orientate correctly
are rejected back into the bowl for a retry. The rejected parts are not lost;
generally, the only things lost are time and production rate. The amount of
decrease in production rate from rejection of mis-oriented parts is related
directly to the efficiency of the vibratory bowl and part selector track. The
overall efficiency of the system can be quantified from the matrix of
individual rejecter probabilities along the selector track. High production
rates are necessary, vibration rate can be sped up with corresponding higher
feed rates up to a point. The science of orientation and feeding applies not
only to small metal parts, but also to plastic bottles, moldings, castings, and
even food products. Food products present special problems for automation
engineers due to the variation in item sizes and shapes.
No comments:
Post a Comment